DRC approves revised electoral law

5260C20C-4928-4E68-A9A5-510F47FDB471_w640_r1_s_cx0_cy12_cw96KINSHASA — The parliament of the Democratic Republic of Congo has modified and approved an electoral law following criticism that it was aimed at extending the incumbent president’s term in office.

Both the upper house of parliament, the Senate and the lower house, the National Assembly, passed the modified version of the law on Sunday.

Lawmakers scrapped a controversial provision in the original Bill, which had triggered days of deadly protests against the government.

“The line in question (will) be purely and simply withdrawn from the law,” Aubin Minaku, the head of the lower house, said prior to the final vote, adding, “We have responded to (the people’s) expectations so that there is serenity.”

The opposition groups had said the original Bill would allow President Joseph Kabila to prolong his stay in power.

Kabila became president in 2001 and is barred from seeking another term under the current constitution.

The opposition parties have been holding protests against the bill, which aimed to delay presidential and parliamentary polls beyond 2016.

Earlier, a coalition of opposition parties called on protesters to occupy the parliament building to stop passing any laws affecting the election.

They are demanding that the 43-year-old president step down.

At least 42 people have been killed in the capital, Kinshasa, and other parts of the country in recent days. — Press TV.

Related Posts

DeliverED! . . . Zim lands UN Security Council seat . . . President hails diplomatic milestone

Innocent Madonko and Zvamaida Murwira-Herald Reporters PRESIDENT Mnangagwa has described as a “significant diplomatic milestone”, Zimbabwe’s huge victory which secured the country a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security…

CAB3 gets overwhelming public support

Nyore Madzianike-Senior Reporter THE Constitutional Amendment No.3 Bill has received overwhelming support with more than 530 000 written submissions to Parliament in its favour, while 2 935 were against it,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×