Chronicle Editor
MAX VERSTAPPEN and Lewis Hamilton were third and fifth fastest in pre-season testing as the row over Mercedes’ car took a new twist.
Red Bull team principal Christian Horner said the Mercedes design complied with the rules a day after being quoted saying it was “illegal”.
Horner said it was an “extreme” rules interpretation, but: “It looks like it ticks all the (legality) boxes.”
He insisted his earlier quoted comments about the car “weren’t made”.
The row has overshadowed the first two days of testing in Bahrain, which ended with Verstappen 0.13 seconds quicker than Hamilton.
The world champion trailed pace-setter Carlos Sainz of Ferrari by 0.479secs, with Lance Stroll’s Aston Martin third ahead of Hamilton, as a number of senior figures emphasised that it was not possible to accurately judge form from testing.
Haas driver Kevin Magnussen set a time 0,3secs faster than Sainz in the extra hour his team was allotted at the end of the day to make up for time they lost on Thursday as a result of a freight delay.
There is one day of testing left on Saturday before the new season starts at the same Bahrain track next weekend.
Mercedes turned heads at the start of the Bahrain test on Thursday when they unveiled an aerodynamic upgrade to the car that first ran at the opening test in Barcelona two weeks ago.
The upgrade features minimised side-pods and turns the mandatory side-impact structures into aerodynamic wing sections, with the wing mirrors mounted on them.
Germany’s Auto Motor Und Sport quoted Horner expressing doubts about the legality of the new design, which Mercedes have introduced at this week’s final pre-season test in Bahrain.
In the article, Horner says: “Those are not mirror mounts, but two wings. In addition, they have built vertical baffles on top. They have nothing to do with the mirror mount.
“From our point of view, Mercedes has gone a step too far. That does not correspond to the spirit of the regulations. For us, these wings are illegal.”
On Thursday, Red Bull at first said the quotes were “incorrect” before clarifying that they were not “official”.
The journalist in question, the veteran reporter Michael Schmidt, stands by the story.
Attending the official news conference on Friday, Horner was asked about the apparent contradiction in his position.
He replied: “Comments have been quoted that certainly weren’t made. The car is innovative and it’s an interesting solution. The Mercedes car looks like it complies with the regulations. It is just a different interpretation, a different solution.”
He added: “There’s not really anything that defines the spirit of the regulations; it either complies or it doesn’t. That’s not really for us to judge.
“(Governing body) The FIA have access to all of the drawings. A design like that would have surely been submitted in advance. It’s an interesting concept, it’s a radical concept. So, is it quick or not? Only time will tell, but in terms of its compliance, that’s very much an FIA matter.”
Horner said it was “impossible to tell” which teams were in the best competitive shape.
“What you can say is that it’s only going to be next Saturday (in qualifying at the Bahrain Grand Prix) you’ll get the first snapshot as the fuel comes out,” he said, “(when) people run as close to the weight limit as they can.
“I don’t think Mercedes have shown their hand yet. Ferrari look the form team. Hopefully we can be in there as well.
It looks like McLaren have a strong car. Alpine have a strong car.” – BBC Sport
Online Reporter