Industry support

Given that gambling poses a social risk, Museveni’s ban should have received unqualified support. But it hasn’t. Major online gambling proponents such as the American Gaming Association, the Professional Golfers Association, and the National Basketball Association argue that banning sports betting, gaming, and gambling cuts off much-needed revenue. They say that gambling revenue stimulates economic growth, lowers taxes, pays down national debt, funds social programmes and provides entertainment options.

A second argument advanced against the ban is that it will simply push gambling underground. This, in turn, will contribute to an overall rise in crime, incidents of match-fixing, and significant loss of government revenue as has been documented in India and Singapore.

There’s some evidence to support this argument. In some countries people have been swindled in underground gambling markets. This has prompted Brazil, Cambodia, Russia, China, Slovakia, Sweden, Denmark, Romania and Greece, among others, to rethink their gambling bans. These countries have made efforts to re-regulate the gambling market after initially restricting or completely banning the industry.

Related Posts

President Mnangagwa launches African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) National Programme of Action

President Mnangagwa is today expected to officially launch the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) National Programme of Action at the New Parliament Building in Mt Hampden. Our Reporter Harmony Agere…

Harare lights up as 11 clubs chase glory for COSANA

Hello Africa! Welcome to our live coverage of the Confederation of Southern Africa Netball Association (COSANA) Championships in Harare – where excitement is building as 11 clubs from across Southern…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *