daniel chigunweSifelani Tsiko
Agric, Environment Editor
The just-ended talks in Nairobi on the new Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) show the complexity of reaching consensus on major issues required in some sections of the Convention of Biological Diversity.
As expected, there was limited progress in Nairobi, narrowing hopes of securing a transformative global agreement capable of tackling the world’s accelerating nature crisis.
All this is happening just before parties meet again for COP15 of the CBD set for December 5 to 17 in Montreal, Canada.
Nature is in crisis and time is running out.
The Nairobi talks could have been a critical step on the road to the biodiversity convention’s Conference of Parties in Montreal.
With nature declining globally at rates unprecedented in human history, with grave impacts particularly on vulnerable people and countries, a consensus has emerged that we must halt and reverse the loss of biodiversity by 2030.
We need to have more nature at the end of the decade than at its start − a nature-positive world for people and planet − with governments, businesses and society combining to ensure that biodiversity loss is reversed.
The text on the table at the end of these negotiations is inconclusive and woefully inadequate.
We are leaving with many of the elements for a strong global deal on the table, but needing further negotiations with difficult decisions still to come.
We had hoped for more and nature needs more; however, we are far from the path towards a transformative deal at COP15.
Agreeing and adopting a truly transformative and inclusive GBF is a once-in-a-decade opportunity that should not be missed.
A chance for all of us to be part of a historic moment, for nature and people, considering the precarious state of our planet’s biodiversity.
“The world needs to understand how critical it is that an ambitious agreement is adopted at COP15.
“Climate change and nature are inextricably linked – nature is impacted by climate change but is also part of the solution.
“We call on leaders to give the nature crisis the attention it requires,” says Melanie Heath, director of science, policy and information at BirdLife International.
Added Ken Mwathe, policy and communications co-ordinator, BirdLife International Africa:
“Most key elements of an ambitious framework are on the table and consensus is being built – but difficult choices remain, and ambition must build from Nairobi on the road to COP15 for a nature-positive deal that the world needs.
“Governments and stakeholders have no better chance than now to put in place a framework that will transform the harmful way in which we live, to the detriment of biodiversity and ultimately ourselves. A business-as-usual approach is not an option.
The new framework must contain bold, transformative elements including increased, predictable funding to support implementation.”
Says Yemisi Fawibe-Oke of Nigerian Conservation Foundation:
“The post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework truly takes into account knowledge gathered from science and stakeholders over the last decades.
“This meeting in Nairobi, billed as a crucial avenue to get our acts together before COP15 in Montreal, provided a chance for Parties present to truly move past sentiments, and replace talk with action by producing text that is ambitious in all ramifications. Unfortunately, this remains to be seen.”
Human activities have led to the loss of 83 percent of animal species and 50 percent of plant species since the dawn of civilisation.
Nature-positive means halting and reversing species loss, and BirdLife International has been at the forefront of addressing this on the African continent.
An example is Morocco, where the Griffon Vulture is now breeding after 40 years, thanks to efforts by the BirdLife Partner organisation in the country.
In Southern Africa, BirdLife Partners are working to save vultures whose populations have declined by up to 97 percent.
Linked to this is the conservation of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) which contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity’, across terrestrial, freshwater, coastal and marine ecosystems.
Agriculture is a critical sector in Africa, employing over 60 percent of the continent’s workforce.
Biodiversity is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss in Africa.
Thus, an effective Global Biodiversity Framework should look at nature-friendly farming methods, which include reducing harmful pesticides and regenerative agriculture, while protecting useful organisms including pollinators and birds.
BirdLife International is calling for an ambitious framework in four areas in particular.
Firstly, the nature agency says the global community needs to put in place a framework to halt species extinctions and increase the abundance of species populations, through addressing factors that drive species towards extinction.
Such action, the nature agency believes, should reverse species declines so that the world becomes nature-positive by 2030.
Secondly, the agency says there is a need to effectively manage a scaled-up system of protected and conserved areas covering 30 percent of the planet’s land and ocean areas by 2030, which focus on KBAs and other areas of importance for biodiversity.
Linked to this is the critical role of Indigenous People and Local Communities (IPLCs), who number about 476 million people, approximately six percent of the global population, but inhabit about 85 percent of areas proposed for biodiversity conservation.
Thus, IPLCs are critical partners in helping achieve ecosystem protection, conservation and restoration.
By working with partners and local communities through a ‘local to global’ approach, the nature agency says this demonstrated significant conservation success, and therefore welcome acknowledgement of the rights and critical role played by IPLCs in the Nairobi talks.
Birdlife International says the new framework must have an effective mechanism and means for implementation.
This includes a clear monitoring and reporting framework and scaled-up predictable financing.
Africa faces a huge shortfall in financing biodiversity conservation, estimated at about US$700 billion dollars every year, so addressing this finance gap is critical.
Given the slow pace of negotiations witnessed in Nairobi, far more commitment and political support at the highest level is needed ahead of Montreal.
Tackling biodiversity loss requires ambition, leadership, co-operation and political will from countries, without which the world would be staring at a bleak future.
The clock is ticking, and the alarm is set: Africa must rally together to ensure its voice is heard in Montreal.
Online Reporter