Multi-billion-rand project delayed again

The organised construction industry has expressed serious doubt about the reasons provided by the Border Management Agency (BMA) for the extension of the date for the submission of bids for a multi-billion-rand South African border posts redevelopment project.

Minister of Home Affairs Aaron Motsoaledi announced in June 2022 that his department would “in a few months’ time” issue a public request for proposals for a project to completely overhaul and rebuild South Africa’s six busiest border posts at a cost of more than R6 billion.

In September 2023 he announced that the request for proposals had been published for interested parties to submit bids on a public-private partnership (PPP) arrangement for the redevelopment of the border posts.

Interested parties had to submit their bids by March 4, 2024.

However, the BMA reported on Monday that the date for the submission of bids to redevelop and redesign the six border posts had been extended until July 4, 2024.

It said the extension followed requests from several potential bidders to extend the deadline.

The time needed for the prospective bidders to raise funds to finance the project under the PPP arrangement; and

The long holiday period between December 2023 and January 2024, which interrupted the consultative work of the potential bidders about the project. — Moneyweb.

Related Posts

DeliverED! . . . Zim lands UN Security Council seat . . . President hails diplomatic milestone

Innocent Madonko and Zvamaida Murwira-Herald Reporters PRESIDENT Mnangagwa has described as a “significant diplomatic milestone”, Zimbabwe’s huge victory which secured the country a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security…

CAB3 gets overwhelming public support

Nyore Madzianike-Senior Reporter THE Constitutional Amendment No.3 Bill has received overwhelming support with more than 530 000 written submissions to Parliament in its favour, while 2 935 were against it,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×