Mutambara takes case to Supreme Court

He argues that the lower court erred in accepting the respondents’ evidence in light of disputes raised by him.
“The appellant among other things denied interfering with the organs or structures of the MDC. The court a quo erred in confirming the provisional orders amended,” argues Prof Mutambara. “There were no facts

supporting the amendments which amendments were made during the proceedings and without proper notice to the appellant.”

He also argues that the court had erred in holding that he was to be interdicted from attending any meetings of the inclusive Government or regional and international bodies in the capacity of a principal in the inclusive Government.
The court, he says, also erred in holding that his being a principal was related to the current president of the MDC.

ALSO READ

The DPM says there were no facts placed before the court where he performed functions or powers vested in the president of the MDC.
He further argues that given the historical context of the “so-called” inclusive Government and various claims to the leadership of the MDC, a principal in the inclusive Government did not refer to the current president of the MDC.

It is also Prof Mutambara’s argument that MDC and Mrs Misihairabwi-Mushonga had no right to any leadership elected at the congress.
“The court failed in not properly articulating what irreparable harm appellant was causing to the party. The court a quo also erred in holding that the MDC president equated to a principal.

“The word principal was not defined in the GPA. It is submitted that in this context of the GPA and inclusive Government, principal refers to the persons who signed the GPA . . .”
He submitted that in light of the disputes in the matter, the court had erred in declaring that he was not the MDC president. He wants the superior court to set aside the lower court’s decision.

MDC, through Mrs Misihairabwi-Mushonga, had sought ratification of an interim relief granted on 11 February this year.
The party further sought that Prof Mutambara be interdicted from attending any meeting of whatever description of the principals in the inclusive Government or any regional or international body as a principal.

It also wanted him interdicted from exercising any function or power vested in the president of the MDC or principal in the inclusive Government and that he be declared as not the president of MDC and pay the costs of the suit.
The respondents will file their response within 14 days once Prof Mutambara files the actual appeal.

 

Related Posts

CCZ calls for collective action on food safety

Nqobile Bhebhe, [email protected] THE Consumer Council of Zimbabwe (CCZ) has called for a collective approach to food safety saying the responsibility does not rest solely on regulators or consumers, but…

CCZ calls for collective action on food safety

Nqobile Bhebhe, [email protected]  THE Consumer Council of Zimbabwe (CCZ) has called for a collective approach to food safety saying the responsibility does not rest solely on regulators or consumers, but…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×