R80bn, 10yrs needed to fix Transnet’s rail network

It may cost R80 billion and take 10 years to fix Transnet’s core rail network, comprising about 5 000km out of SA’s total rail network of 21 000km.

That excludes the bulk export lines and any shorter connecting rail lines. The core network connects SA’s major cities: Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town and Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth).

Getting the core network right will add between 0,5 percent and 1 percent to annual GDP, which in itself will create hundreds of thousands of new jobs. It’s a tantalising reward for a relatively modest investment.

Speaking at Transport Forum’s rail symposium last week, Jan Havenga, professor of logistics at Stellenbosch University, outlined some key steps to get SA’s rail sector back on track.

“The R80 billion it will cost to repair the core rail network is my estimate, but I am confident in the number. What’s interesting about this is we could quite easily find this money from development banks and others at very low interest rates, repayable over 30 years or more,” Havenga told Moneyweb.

“But for that to happen we need to get the policy right. Our rail network has to be managed in the same way that Sanral manages our major roads, with long-term concessions, and the private sector maintaining the roads and charging a toll.”

The 10-year timeline to fix the network is less daunting once the project is spliced into more manageable outcomes, starting with the repair of the Durban-Johannesburg line, a project that could be done in two to four years.

The publication of the Rail Network Statement outlining proposed tariffs and remedial action to fix the network was a respectable start, but the tariffs are too high to attract large-scale investment.  – Moneyweb

Private sector investors are expected to help pay down Transnet’s crushing debt of R130 billion – half of this due to state capture.

Havenga says the government will have to assume this debt if it wants to attract serious private money.

The tariffs proposed by Transnet mean it will cost 2,5 times more to use rail than a truck from Cape Town to Johannesburg – a clearly unsustainable position so long as private operators are left to pay Transnet’s debt.

“It’s good that we have the Rail Network Statement, but there are a few prior steps needed,” says Havenga.

“First, we need a proper technical assessment of the network, which the National Treasury is currently undertaking. That will give us a better picture of the state of the network, and where we need to prioritise our spending.”

The good news is that there are signs of reversal in Transnet’s collapsing performance under new management, led by new Transnet CEO Michelle Phillips and Transnet Freight Rail CEO Russell Baatjies.

Speaking at the Transport Forum, Baatjies outlined steps being taken to improve performance at Transnet Freight Rail (TFR), starting with the recovery in volumes shipped by rail, and better execution to improve commercial returns across its operations.

Regulated reform of the rail sector is well underway with the Rail Network Statement and the imminent appointment of an independent infrastructure manager (IM) to referee the use of the network by new private sector operators competing with TFR.

Gavin Kelly, CEO of the Road Freight Association, told the Transport Forum that road freight had nearly doubled in the last decade, while rail freight has declined 35 percent.

The South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) estimates that transporting coal via rail to Richards Bay costs about US$11 (R202) a ton compared to nearly US$70 (R1 288) a ton by truck.

The way out of this lies in creating public-private partnerships and improving modal competitiveness across the logistics chain.

Havenga said in an ideal world the rail network would require multiple infrastructure managers, one for each of the key routes.

“In this way, the rail network will start to look a lot like Sanral, with private sector concessionaries managing and maintaining the routes and charging an access fee or slot charge which is like toll on road, and which is competitive with road.”

The key rail corridors will be accompanied by multiple ‘nodes’ such as dry port storage and handling, freight villages, fuel terminals and sea and airports.

Havenga estimates that a rail-friendly corridor between Joburg and Cato Ridge outside Durban should be able to handle 37% of the traffic between the two cities, as opposed to 14,1 percent currently. Moneyweb

Related Posts

Mega Market moves to snap up Lobels in bid to dominate food value chain

Nelson Gahadza Mega Market (Private) Limited, owned by Shiraan Ahmed, has moved to acquire 100 percent of Lobels Holdings (Private) Limited in a proposed transaction that could see one of…

Super El Niño: President urges caution

Joseph Madzimure and Precious Manomano FARMERS must prioritise early-maturing and drought-resistant crops for the 2026-2027 summer cropping season as Zimbabwe braces for a likely Super El Niño-induced dry spell, President…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *