Vincent Gono, Day Editor
FOR decades, many African nations have grappled with elusive socio-economic progress, often relying on development models imported wholesale from former colonial powers.
Most of these approaches are disconnected from the continent’s rich cultural heritage and indigenous knowledge systems and have failed to deliver sustainable growth or foster genuine national pride.
As a result, Africa’s journey towards prosperity remains hindered by a lingering legacy of cultural alienation and economic dependency despite being the envy of many as home to all the resources required for development.
The continent has suffered from the paradox of plenty but there is a compelling alternative — one exemplified by China — that underscores the importance of embedding development within a society’s own cultural fabric.
China has prioritised indigenous values, traditions and identity and has charted a path of remarkable economic success without relinquishing its cultural sovereignty — a model that highlights that true progress arises not solely from external prescriptions but from harnessing the unique cultural assets that define a nation’s identity.
The Asian giant has demonstrated that economic prosperity is possible without necessarily following the political conquest and exploitation route that defines the prosperity of most Western First World countries.
It has shown in no small measure that culture is colossally important in developing societies from past to present and its example can be used by most Third World countries that are still struggling to unbuckle themselves and decolonise their identity and development models from imperialist systems.
China has re-centred development around cultural perspectives that exemplify values, attitudes and shared beliefs offering a promising blueprint for Africa’s future.
Development in China has been anchored on a pride of identity, use of traditional cultural resources and an unwavering focus on indigenous knowledge systems as the umbilical cord that connect its people to all development facets.
Chinese President Xi Jinping in The Governance of China compendium contends that it is inevitable for China, a country with a unique culture, history and basic conditions, to choose a development path featuring its own characteristics.
“As for traditional Chinese culture and foreign things, we should make the past serve the present and foreign things serve China, discard the dross and select the essential, eliminate the false and retain the true and adopt traditional Chinese culture and foreign things after a thorough and well considered review of both,” he says.
He stresses the point that China does not use borrowed solutions that are alien to its values, beliefs, ideologies and philosophy but use home-grown solutions that have a moral grounding in the people’s culture.
Culture generates assets such as skills, products, expression and insights that contribute to the social and economic well-being of a community and many Third World countries that are reeling under various economic pressures can pluck a leaf from China’s development model.
The difference between China and most Third World countries in Africa particularly Zimbabwe is that most African countries follow a prescribed model of development strongly linked to their colonisers.
Their cultures have suffered strong adulteration from the former colonisers whose vice-grip most countries are failing to unhinge themselves from both culturally and economically.
Many countries in East Asia, particularly China, have been resisting traditions from Western culture. It is the use of Asian values and institutions that is responsible for the Chinese economic advancement.
Zimbabwe is very diverse along most human dimensions: ethnicity, language, culture, history and economic well-being.
Despite the diversity, there are common threads that contribute to the lack of economic development.
There is no proper definition of what the national question is and what constitutes the national dream and as such patriotism to core national values and aspirations has been elusive.
African philosophy scholar and academic Mr Joel Mukusha noted in an interview that most African countries were collapsing under the weight of a history of oppression and needed strong lessons from China on redefining themselves, their development goals, values and philosophy without these being prescribed to them by former colonisers.
“China has managed to define itself without prescribed doses of imported ideas. Home-grown solutions have been nurtured that people identify with, communism, socialism and Marxism have been popularised to define and re-energise the Chinese Dream where patriotism is cultivated and where inherited culture and traditions meet harmoniously with innovation to produce a modern country not divorced from cultural beliefs that bind the society,” he said.
China has managed to properly handle the relationship between inheritance and innovation, with the focus on transforming and developing the fine traditional culture in a creative way.
Mr Mukusha said Africa should follow the philosophy and culture of Ubuntu/Hunhu, which emphasises the ideals of communism, patriotism, respect, trust and hard-work. He said such values, if upheld, would see Zimbabwe developing its societies.
“Culture is socially acceptable transmitted behaviour, patterns, norms, beliefs and values of a given community. It is a set of shared and enduring meanings, values and beliefs that characterise national, ethnic and other groups and orient their behaviour. Culture is dynamic, interactive, and synergistic and it intermixes with all the elements of a society, especially economic development.
“It is measured by indicators of individual values and beliefs, such as trust and respect for others and confidence in individual self-determination,” he added.
He offered that such vices as corruption, dishonesty lack of empathy for the poor, laziness are not part of the African philosophy of Ubuntu and are anti-development but have sadly become the definition of many African societies.
Former Ambassador to China and Zanu-PF Secretary for Information and Publicity, Ambassador Christopher Mutsvangwa says if DNA is the foundation of the institutional memory of living organisms, then culture is its equivalent in the institutional memory of society.
Culture, he says, is the art and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively. It is shown through ideas, customs and social behaviour of society. It is the embodiment of shared values that define the identity of a social grouping.
“China with the largest population on earth has developed its culture over 5 000 years. Its capacity to defend itself ensured that by and large its society could repulse, withstand or absorb repeated ructions from other outside societies. It is this aspect that has given Chinese culture pride of place among its society and admiration from other societies,” said Ambassador Mutsvangwa.
President Mnangagwa has demonstrated his rootedness to culture as a development vehicle with visits to various historical and cultural sites in Bulawayo and the country at large in what Mr Mukusha described as an act of de-emphasising politics.
He recently called investors into the country to respect the people’s customs and culture and not seek to override them
“As we welcome investors in our jurisdiction, we expect that they will adhere to the Constitution and laws of our country, while also respecting our people, customs and culture,” he said while presenting the State of the Nation Address (Sona).
Mr Mukusha said it is gratifying that the country’s leadership is taking practical steps to strike a balance between the need for investors who appreciate the country’s culture and the importance of learning how to inherit before innovating, something he said is important in coming up with culturally acceptable solutions to the country’s problems.
The country’s economic blueprint — National Development Strategy 1 (NDS1) emphasises that culture has the power to transform entire societies, strengthen local communities, foster strong family values and forge a sense of identity and belonging for people of all ages.
The NDS1 clearly articulates this when it says, “As a collective phenomenon, national identity can arise as a direct result of the presence of elements from the “common points” in people’s daily lives. These include national symbols, music, language, the nation’s history, national consciousness and cultural artefacts.
“The expression of one’s national identity seen in a positive light is patriotism, which is characterised by national pride and positive emotion of love for one’s country. Cultural programmes contribute towards improved social cohesion, sense of national identity and pride.”
The objective, according to the economic blueprint, is to increase the level of local consumption of cultural products and services from 15 percent in 2020 to 40 percent by the time it lapses at the end of this year.
Unesco emphasises that culture is a key element in the fight against poverty and preserving cultural values is important to validate the social contract between the Governments and the governed.
Culture therefore, extends across all the dimensions of social capital such as mutual confidence, trust and responsible civic behaviour and China’s example can set the tone and pace of development for many African countries that still seek to detach themselves from the cultural refuge of the West and define their own development paths.




