By Mabasa Sasa
New Focus: Economic Potential atop Political Trust
Over the past fortnight, Zimbabwe’s Vice‑President Constantino Chiwenga has travelled across China — from Beijing to Xiong’an and then Zhejiang — with a distinctly practical‑focused agenda covering technology, energy, manufacturing, mining, mineral beneficiation, smart cities, healthcare and investment.
Back in Harare, Chinese Ambassador Zhou Ding hosted a reception on 16 September to mark the 77th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China. Nearly 300 government officials, diplomats, Chinese enterprise representatives and community stakeholders attended. While the occasion carried customary diplomatic symbolism, the core message from both sides was distinctly economic: unlock the commercial potential embedded within the bilateral relationship.
This captures the defining feature of the current moment. The long‑standing political rapport between China and Zimbabwe is not superseded by economic engagement; rather, it serves as the solid foundation upon which far‑reaching economic cooperation can be constructed.
Pursuing Real‑world Knowledge Transfer Instead of Demonstrations
VP Chiwenga’s visit offers meaningful insights. It was not limited to sightseeing or purely ceremonial meetings. In Xiong’an, China’s pioneering model for innovative modern‑city development, he inspected the Zhongguancun Science and Technology Park and smart‑energy facilities to understand how research, technology, energy systems and urban planning integrate in practice. Speaking to Zimbabwean media afterwards, he stressed that what Harare seeks is real technology and knowledge transfer, not mere technology demonstrations. “The most important thing is that Zimbabwe wants to work with China, and China wants to work with Zimbabwe to transfer knowledge,” he noted.
Zimbabwe needs more than exposure to impressive overseas innovations. It requires practical mechanisms through which proven foreign solutions can be locally adapted, financed, constructed and maintained. That explains why the Vice‑President’s interest in Xiong’an extended to Mt Hampden New City. He proposed provincial‑level links between Hebei Province and relevant Zimbabwean counterparts, so that development lessons from Xiong’an can inform Zimbabwe’s own new‑city ambitions. The core logic is straightforward: learn, adapt, implement.
The same thinking guided his engagements in Zhejiang, a province renowned for its dynamic private‑sector‑driven industrial vitality. Zimbabwe is endowed with rich mineral resources, yet local policy thinking is evolving beyond treating mineral wealth as an economic strategy on its own. Addressing officials in Wenzhou, the cradle of China’s vibrant private‑business community, VP Chiwenga urged Chinese companies active in Zimbabwe to deepen local manufacturing and complete more segments of value chains domestically. “We would want relevant firms to carry out manufacturing processes in Zimbabwe because we possess the mineral resources required to produce these goods,” he stated.
This marks an important shift in local development thinking. Tsingshan‑group‑linked investments in Zimbabwe already cover steel, ferrochrome, coal, lithium and power, with Dinson Iron and Steel Company’s Manhize plant entering production in 2024. CHINT has meanwhile introduced solar power and smart electrical technologies to the Zimbabwean market.
The central question today is no longer whether Chinese capital should flow into Zimbabwe. Instead, it centres on what local industrial capacity Zimbabwe can jointly build with Chinese industry: processing lithium locally instead of only exporting concentrates, producing components to reduce import dependency, building home‑grown engineering capacity around steel projects, developing integrated energy systems for mining and manufacturing operations, and connecting domestic suppliers to China‑linked global value chains.
Beyond Infrastructure: Expanding Cooperation to Knowledge‑driven Sectors
Bilateral cooperation has broadened well beyond infrastructure and mining.
In August, Zimbabwe and China inaugurated the Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on Agricultural Ecology and Cash Crops, a joint initiative between the University of Zimbabwe and China’s Wuhan Botanical Garden. China contributes laboratory equipment and scientific expertise to bridge academic research with real‑world agricultural production and trade.
This initiative may prove as consequential as any large‑scale infrastructure scheme. Zimbabwe’s development constraints increasingly lie in knowledge capacity: raising agricultural yields, processing mineral resources, manufacturing pharmaceuticals, smart grid management, applying artificial intelligence, and translating university research into domestic enterprises and export‑ready products. China’s own development journey provides valuable practical experience for Zimbabwe to draw upon.
Greater emphasis is also being placed on direct business‑to‑business ties.
At a China‑Zimbabwe business luncheon held in August, enterprises from both countries discussed investment prospects, China’s zero‑tariff policy for African nations, and improvements to Zimbabwe’s business operating environment. According to Ambassador Zhou Ding, China remains Zimbabwe’s largest source of foreign direct investment.
This calls for stronger pro‑active engagement from Zimbabwe’s private sector. Governments design cooperation frameworks; national leaders open doors; diplomats facilitate contacts. But businesses must take concrete steps to seize opportunities.
Zimbabwean firms need to build deeper understanding of Chinese markets, standards, supply chains and financing mechanisms. They should view Chinese partners not only as contractors, but also as potential co‑investors, technology collaborators, distributors and gateways to international markets.
The same mindset applies to Chinese enterprises operating locally. The shared vision for cooperation should focus on joint resource development alongside building local industrial ecosystems; on establishing domestic manufacturing capacity in addition to supplying finished goods; and on fostering complete industrial ecosystems alongside making targeted investments. Progress in knowledge and technology transfer can take multiple forms including commercial licensing, joint research and talent training, and requires favourable conditions created by both sides.
From Signed Agreements to Tangible Development Outcomes
The bilateral relationship already boasts substantial on‑the‑ground deliverables: Hwange Power Station Units 7 & 8, Kariba South rehabilitation, airport modernisation, the Manhize steel complex, lithium‑sector investments, plus expanding agricultural and technological collaboration. Ambassador Zhou Ding has highlighted these projects alongside newer initiatives including the High‑Performance Computing Centre, the agricultural joint laboratory, Juncao technology, water boreholes and other community‑focused schemes.
Even so, the next phase of partnership ought to be measured with revised benchmarks. Success should not be counted merely by the volume of memoranda signed. It should be judged by operational factories, realised knowledge transfer, trained local engineers, Zimbabwean goods gaining access to China’s market, domestic enterprises integrated into cross‑border supply chains, locally processed mineral outputs, stable power generation, home‑produced medicines, improved agricultural yields, and newly‑created jobs.
That represents the genuine opportunity amid current positive momentum. Zimbabwe need not replicate China’s development path wholesale. Its goal is to build a more productive, technologically‑empowered and industrialised national economy — drawing useful lessons from China’s experience while adapting them fully to local realities.
Vice‑President Chiwenga’s China mission, Ambassador Zhou Ding’s diplomatic work in Harare, and the growing pipeline of practical joint projects show that Sino‑Zimbabwe relations have arrived at this promising juncture. Time‑honoured friendship has long been firmly established. Turning that goodwill into sustained commercial and developmental gains will demand consistent efforts from governments and enterprises on both sides.
About the Author
Mabasa Sasa is a Zimbabwean independent political‑economic commentator, focusing on Zimbabwe’s foreign relations, regional integration and industrial‑development issues. His analyses are widely published in Zimbabwean media outlets.



