When violence is used create wealth

In the European and American minds, violence is a doctrine of wealth creation by any other means including regime change. Imagine the amount of asymmetric use of the Bible that was employed by missionaries during the colonial era. Imagine the asymmetric use of the law through sanctions and Zdera that caused human suffrage in Zimbabwe, Syria and Iran.

Imagine the violence they employed to cause regime change through coups in DRC, Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria.
The doctrine of using Africans as assets that accrue wealth for Europe and America started in the slave era. The two continents (Europe and America) competed on what God forbids; the mutilation of the human race through violence in order to create wealth.

The Holy Bible tells us very clearly that man shall eat his sweat. What this means is God forbids the use of man as free labour in order to gain individual or national wealth as happened in the slave and colonial era. God forbids man from benefiting from theft whether as an individual, group or nation.

However, Europe and America survive on regime change and plunder of other nation’s wealthy. Events in Iraq and Libya are clear examples of how resources continue to be plundered, stolen in daylight.

The strategy of using violence as a weapon of creating wealth started in Europe with various European wars that dominate today’s history. Remember the Napoleonic wars, the Hitler wars and early wars that were fought between European nations for the creation of an individual country’s wealth. Was Europe not engaged in self-mutilation wars where individual states created wealth through violence? Perhaps it was a case of a chicken eating its own eggs or was it a dog eating its own puppies.

People must understand that Europe and savage violent behaviours are synonymous. America too, became synonymous with human mutilations. Challenging the American or British is enough a reason for them to make you suffer. The world today is living in fear of these untamed lions that salivate to devour mankind.
Many people think that the doctrine of using human beings as slaves was abandoned by these murderous countries. The answer is a big “NO”! Europe claims to have become civil by abandoning slavery but its actions profess otherwise. They are not born again and have chosen to remain predators of mankind.

When Europe and America abandoned slavery they developed new doctrines to strip off poor nations their wealth. Europe led by Britain that went on the rampage of colonising weaker states and continued enslaving people in the colonised African states. Africans were forced to do all the dirty labour first for nothing through chibharo and later getting paid peanuts. On the other hand America started the doctrine of regime change in South America. In almost the same period Europe colonised weaker states, America was engaged in the regime change agenda.

Remember what it did in Panama, Chile and Guatemala, and most recently in Iraq and Libya. It also supported the coups by Mobuto in DRC, Chile, Guatemala and Ghana, effectively removing democratically elected governments as they want to do in Zimbabwe through the MDC formations, all in the name of democracy, rule of law and good governance. What people should ask these pseudo paragons of democracy is whether democracy is enhanced by illegal regime change, violence, coups or by a peaceful electoral process?

Colonised states fought some bitter liberation wars to unshackle themselves from the chains of oppression by these so-called masters of democracy. Once they had lost the wars against the liberation movements, the West set the regime change wheel in motion. The West funded surrogates in order to install puppet governments which they would control like weaponised drones. This is all in pursuance of their violent creation of wealth. The civil society, lawyers, scholars, doctors and educationists were funded to cause mayhem and anarchy in the African nation. This is not fable but is evident in Zimbabwe. Imagine a Judge sitting at night, hearing a case with an objective of releasing a lawyer turned political activists.

Sadly, people whether educated or not, do not learn from history that uncle Tom destroys evidence once his objective is met or if one fails him to meet the objective. Remember what happened to Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and many others. Most of those who made it to the surrogates camp were later killed for one reason or the other. Across Africa, Europe and America employed surrogates for their national interests but later killed them. Surprising, many bad mannered Africans such as the MDC formations continue to enter the surrogate camp where they are used to do things that hurt fellow countrymen knowing pretty well that sooner or later uncle Tom would kill them.

In the initial stages of assuming office of government the leadership of liberation forces were showered with awards as happened to President Mugabe. The idea of the awards was to sway them from keeping the principled line of making sure that their countries were fully liberated. However, once they were viewed to be principled names such as hardliner, dictator, tyranny and so on are created in preparation for regime change. Pseudo opposition parties such as happen in Zambia, Zimbabwe, Ivory Coast, Angola, DRC are founded and funded by the West.

Fellow Africans, when shall we stop being used to mutilate one another for the good of creating wealth for the West? Is the Western involvement in the internal affairs of Kenya not good enough a lesson for Africa to unite against advancing the interest of the West? Is what happened in Ivory Coast, Mali, Libya and Malawi not good enough to make Africa shun violence and resist to be used to do what hurts fellow Africans? Are we not aware that God forbids anyone to do what hurts someone? Icho!