admin
Europe’s egoism (self-interest) premised on greediness, inhuman, undemocratic and savage treatment of the Africans ran havoc as these ungodly human beings destroyed sovereign Africa and caused anarchy that Africans continue to endure today.
When God created the earth and the human race, each race was given its continent and never was earthly allowed to cross over to annex other areas for whatever reasons.
The Bible tells us that ‘man’ must be neighbourly and must treat one another in a way man would want to be treated. It clearly states as a command from God that man must ‘love’ thy neighbour.
The human race from Europe had the audacity to defy this Godly peace command and cause violence hence the world is in turmoil.
America also joined its parentage ‘Europe’ as it did during slavery era and the world now lives in servitude of Europe and America.
The tsunamis that are occurring in these savage continents that of recession, violence, instability and economic stagnation could be punishment given unto them by God; who knows!
These Westerners have made Africa suffer enough that they see our suffering as a success story which they are now exporting to the Arab and Persuasion world. However let them know that God forbids.
Sadly when they came to Africa to colonise us they gave an excuse that it was a gesture for helping the uncivilised Africans to stop killing each other in tribal wars.
Ali Mazrui wrote, “And so when the champions of imperial rule were at their most articulate in its (Pax Britannica) defence, one argument they advanced was that imperialism had given the Africans, for example a chance to know what life was like without violence.”
Is this not a thesis of imperialism monopoly of warfare?In a bitter response to the assertion that Europeans colonised Africa as a way of making Africans live a life without violence Jomo Kenyatta in 1938 said, “the European prides himself on having done a great service to the Africans by stopping the ‘tribal warfare’ and said that African ought to thank the strong power that had liberated them from the ‘constant fear’ of being attacked by the neighbouring warlike tribes.
But consider the difference between the method and motive employed in the so called savage tribal warfare and those employed in the modern warfare wagged by the civilised tribes of Europe and in which the Africans who had no part in quarrels were forced to defend the so called democracy.” (Towards A Pax-Africana, page, 196.)
Was the use of weapons of mass destruction for human mutilation in European wars a better civilised act than the tribal spear war in Africa?
Which of the two types of weaponry systems is more dangerous to human nature? Fellow Africans what the more civilised Jomo Kenyatta, a Pan-Africanist, was demonstrating to the self-acclaimed civilised Europeans was that they fought more barbaric tribal wars than those tamed uncivilised African tribal spear wars they had invaded Africa to stop.
Imagine the destruction of human, geographical and geological space caused by the bombing of Pearl Habour, Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Imagine the savage and murderous destruction of the Balkans when Romania and Yugoslavia were bombed by the so called civilised NATO.
Imagine the human suffrage that was caused in Libya, Egypt and Ivory Coastall aimed at making sure Europe effects regime change.
Does the human, geological and geographical destruction they caused match the tribal spear war they claim to be violent?
What idiocy and nonsensical civilisation does Europe want to mentor Africa on?
Fellow Africans, the whole world is in abyss because the so-called European and American quest for plundering Africa and Arab resources.
People must understand that Jomo Kenyatta’s statement of bitterness was made about a year before the second European war which they code named ‘WW2’. Jomo Kenyatta’s statement of bitterness and the preceding so called WW1 could not stop the civilised Europe to engage in a war of self-mutilation.
In 1923, the Third Pan-African congress held in Lisbon challenged the doctrine of the white man’s exclusive right to initiate wars.
In the same Pan-African congress, Africans called for world disarmament and abolition of war.
The congress argued for the need to link the Negro dignity and world peace. In its argument the Pan-African congress further demanded that the black folk be treated equally as men in line with the dictates of the Holy Bible.
Fellow African peace is a preserve of black Africa as enshrined in the theory of ubuntu/unhu. Violence is an English term for human mutilation that has become a christened mantra of life for Europe and America.
Violence is an ordained satanic verse of the self- acclaimed civilised Europe and America. Sadly ,the spread of this violent culture caught up with fellow Africans of bad manners such as the Dhlakamas of Mozambique, the Savimbis of Angola, the Mobutos of DRC, Chilubas of Zambia, the Quattara of Ivory Coast, The Boko Harama of Nigeria, the M23 of DRC, the rebels of Mali and the list is endless.
In Zimbabwe we have many of our own who have endorsed the culture of violence. This includes the MDC-T, IDAZIM, Beatrice Mtetwa, and some sections of the civil society such as Transparent International, Crisis Coalition of Zimbabwe, and Defenders of Democracy, some lawyers of Human Rights and some Commissioners and Executives of ZACC.
These institutions have exhibited a clear European genre of violence and anarchy.
Most civil societies are supposed to behave in a civil manner and must be the first to respect the rule of law, democracy and governances institutions.
These are people who by the very nature of their name must be guided by the theory of ubuntu/unhu that radiates on tsika dzakanaka (good behaviour).However, like their Western mentors who claim to be civilised but enjoys mutilation of mankind these so called civil societies are obsessed of causing anarchy and mayhem.
The questions that arise are: if these institutions that have names that sound heavenly are needed for democracy, why were they not formed and operationalised during the colonial and decolonisation phases of Africa? Why are they formed and funded by Africa’s erstwhile coloniser?
What kind of freedoms, rights and democracies should prevail in Africa now that the murderous and demonic Europe want to see which they never saw through Lumumba, Nkrumah, Gaddafi, Chitepo and JZ Moyo who they savagely slaughtered like goats for butcher meat?
The MDC-T has been warned by their mentor the American Ambassador to respect institutions of law. Let’s hope they will listen to him.
However, that warning clearly demonstrates the frustration with which the mentor is angered with the shamelessly practices of violence by the MDC-T political activists and their bad mannered youths.
The history of violence has been laid bare by this article. The youths who are the leaders of tomorrow must read the book by Ali Mazrui titled ‘Towards a Pax Africana’ so as to understand how Europe destroyed sovereign Africa and caused anarchy.
Europe’s asymmetric preach of democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and observance of the rule of law is a ploy to cover up anarchic behaviours of MDC-T uncouth political activists such as Mukoko, Mtetwa, some lawyers of human rights, civil society.
In the interest of fair application of the law Mtetwa and Justice Hungwe must with immediate effect resign as they have become political activists there by tarnishing the image of the legal profession. The MDC-T must remember that violence is a Western culture that has no space in mother Africa. Icho!
l PanganaI Kahuni is a political socio-economic commentator
Online Reporter