Shanhai Shenhua expresses outrage over Drogba’s move

their player.
Galatasaray and Drogba himself announced earlier this week that the Ivory Coast star had signed for the Turkish league leaders, apparently ending a two-and-a-half year deal with the Chinese Super League side.

“Currently, Drogba is still a player of the Shanghai Shenhua Football Club, and the contract between both parties is still within the term of validity,” Shenhua said in a statement on its website.

“The club is deeply shocked by the Galatasaray Football Club’s violation of rules by contacting a player still under contract.”

Shenhua planned to appeal to football’s international governing body Fifa over the matter, the statement said.

“The Shanghai Shenhua Football Club is collating all the evidence and materials and preparing to submit them to Fifa so as to protect the club’s interests and prevent greater losses,” it said.
A spokesman for the club declined to comment.

In a posting on his website, Drogba, who arrived in China last July, gave no clue as to the circumstances surrounding his exit from Shenhua, where he was reportedly earning US$300 000 a week.

But Chinese media reported that Drogba had previously asked Fifa to nullify his contract after the club defaulted on payments following a shareholder dispute dating back to September. Drogba’s teammate at both Shanghai and previously Chelsea, French striker Nicolas Anelka, has also just left Shenhua, joining Italian giants Juventus on loan.- AFP.

Related Posts

DeliverED! . . . Zim lands UN Security Council seat . . . President hails diplomatic milestone

Innocent Madonko and Zvamaida Murwira-Herald Reporters PRESIDENT Mnangagwa has described as a “significant diplomatic milestone”, Zimbabwe’s huge victory which secured the country a non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security…

CAB3 gets overwhelming public support

Nyore Madzianike-Senior Reporter THE Constitutional Amendment No.3 Bill has received overwhelming support with more than 530 000 written submissions to Parliament in its favour, while 2 935 were against it,…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×