The irony of it Zim open for business as US shutdown

Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Dingizulu Moyo
Joseph E Stiglitz’s book, The Price of Inequality, first published in 2012 is a must read for any progressive Zimbabwean as it demystifies the United States of America as a land of opportunity. The book retraces how America’s economy has since 2000 widened the gap between the rich and poor.

It unequivocally makes it clear without fear or favour how America’s policies have contributed to the current shutdown of the superpower’s economy.

Stiglitz was Chief Economist at the World Bank until January 2000 and is currently professor at the Columbia Business School.
This comes into direct contrast to Zimbabwe’s policies, which since 2000, have worked towards integrating the poor into the mainstream economy thereby creating a wider base for wealth creation in the process avoiding a complete shutdown of the economy which the west and America included had anticipated by the year 2008.

How a country without sanctions like America will come to a shutdown, when one that it has slapped with illegal sanctions is still going strong is amazing inasmuch as it breaks new grounds for research by world economists.

Zimbabwe’s policies are epitomised by the land reform programme of 2000 and the on-going indigenisation and economic empowerment programme.

Interestingly, Zimbabwe’s policies of uplifting the living standards of the generality of the people coincided with America’s tide of the growing inequality gap which started in 2000, the same year the land reform programme roared into life in earnest.

Whereas on the eve of the land reform Zimbabwe boasted of a least 6000 white farmers, the programme saw at least 300 000 landless people acquire land.

To this effect Stiglitz postulates that, “. . . for the past 30 years, we have become increasingly a nation divided: not only has the top been growing fastest, but the bottom has actually been declining . . . (But then, as we’ve seen, beginning around 2000, inequality grew at an even more rapid pace.)”

Stiglitz argument presents the US economy as a fulfilment of the ancient Greek historian Thucydides who said, “right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”

More astonishingly which might not be believable to most Zimbabweans who view America as the land of opportunity, Stiglitz reveals that, “. . . large numbers of Americans go to bed at least once a month hungry, not because they are on diet but because they can’t afford food.”

More so America’s Economic Mobility Project and research from the Economic Policy Institute makes stunning revelations to the effect that:

  • Poor kids who succeed academically are less likely to graduate from college than richer kids who do worse in school.
  • Even if they graduate from college, the children of the poor are still worse off than low achieving children of the rich.

Stiglitz goes on to sum up what he terms as stark and uncomfortable facts about the US economy as follows:
1. Recent US income growth primarily occurs at the top 1 percent of the income distribution
2. As a result there is growing inequality.
3. And those at the bottom and in the middle are actually worse off today than they were at the beginning of the century.
4. Inequalities in wealth are even greater than inequalities in income.
5. Inequalities are apparent not just in income but in a variety of other variables that reflect standards of living such as insecurity and health.
6. Life is particularly harsh at the bottom – and the recession made it much worse.
7. There has been a hollowing out of the middle class.
8. There is little income mobility – the notion of America as a land of opportunity is a myth.
9. And America has more inequality than any other advanced industrialised country, it does less to correct these inequities, and inequality is growing more than in many other countries.

Surely, if America’s policies have been this flawed, how then can the same country be taken seriously in so far as directing policies to other nations?

Why the MDC-T thought it was going to get into power by creating jobs, its masters were failing to, is another serious revelation on why the people should stick to Zanu-PF the people’s revolutionary party.

Indeed this is a must read book for people who constitute Zimbabwe’s future as in a way it soothes one with sobriety in as much as it invokes the spirit of nationalism.

Dingizulu Mahlathini Moyo. A Bulawayo based political and social commentator.

Related Posts

Budiriro: Council delays release of funds for sewer recovery efforts

Remember Deketeke–Municipal Correspondent Harare City Council is yet to release funds required to hire a honey sucker to drain a sewer line where authorities suspect more bodies could be trapped…

Front-loading green skills key to sustaining Zimbabwe’s development gains

Herald Reporter AS Zimbabwe accelerates its transition towards a climate-resilient, upper-middle-income economy under National Development Strategy 2 (NDS2), stakeholders are increasingly calling for greater investment in youth skills development to…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×