Jacqueline Ntaka, [email protected]
FOR years, warnings about artificial intelligence came mostly from film makers, technology critics and people worried about machines taking over the world. Now, some of the strongest warnings are coming from a different place altogether: the people actually building the technology.

That is what has made the recent comments by former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon so interesting. Coxon claims that many researchers working on advanced AI genuinely believe there is a possibility that the technology could one day become so powerful that humans struggle to control it.
To the average person, that sounds like the plot of a Hollywood movie. But it is harder to dismiss when the warning comes from someone who has been inside the industry.
The concern is not really about what AI can do today. Most people are already familiar with AI tools that can write emails, generate images, summarise documents or answer questions. Useful as they are, these systems still make mistakes. They can get facts wrong, invent information and sometimes fail at tasks that seem simple to humans.
The fear is about where the technology might be heading.
AI has improved at a staggering pace over the past few years. Tasks that seemed impossible not long ago are now routine. That rapid progress has left some researchers wondering what happens if future systems become capable of improving themselves or operating with far less human oversight than they do today.
Those who are worried argue that humanity has a habit of creating powerful technologies before fully understanding their long-term consequences. In their view, it would be irresponsible to wait for problems to emerge before taking safety seriously. Better to put strong guardrails in place now than try to fix things later.
What gives these warnings added weight is that they are not coming from a handful of fringe voices.
A growing number of people within the AI industry have called for stronger regulation, greater transparency and more attention to safety. Even some of the leaders driving AI development have publicly acknowledged the need for caution.
Yet there is another side to the argument, and it is one that cannot be ignored.
Many experts believe the claims of human extinction are being exaggerated. They point out that today’s AI systems are still tools. Powerful tools, certainly, but tools nonetheless. They do not possess human judgement, emotions or independent goals in the way many science fiction stories suggest.
Sceptics also note that almost every major technological breakthrough has sparked fears about the future. When electricity arrived, people worried about its dangers. The same happened with radio, television, computers and the internet. Society adapted, governments introduced regulations where necessary and life moved on.
Some argue that focusing too much on distant, hypothetical threats distracts attention from the problems already in front of us. Job losses caused by automation, the spread of misinformation, online scams, privacy concerns and the growing power of large technology companies are issues affecting people right now.
From that perspective, the question is not whether AI will wipe out humanity, but how society can make sure the technology benefits ordinary people while limiting its harms.
That leaves governments with a difficult task. They must encourage innovation and economic growth while ensuring that proper safeguards are in place. Move too slowly and risks may grow unchecked. Move too aggressively and they could stifle technologies that have the potential to improve lives.
l Jacqueline Ntaka is the CEO of Mviyo Technologies, a local tech company that provides custom software development, mobile applications and data analytics solutions. She can be contacted on [email protected]



