Online Reporter
Employee Relations
Dr Request Machimbira
IN workplace disciplinary proceedings, where reputations are forged and destinies decided, one figure stands sentinel: the chairperson. As the vanguard of integrity within disciplinary processes, they hold the reins of fairness, navigating the labyrinthine complexities of employment law and organisational justice.
Their role is pivotal; their impact profound. A misstep can spell disaster, while a deft touch can cement trust and reinforce the foundations of organisational governance, while simultaneously promoting employer brands and, ultimately, productivity. This role is not for the faint-hearted, nor is it for the reckless.
The bedrock of workplace governance
Disciplinary actions are the foundation of a fair and governed workplace. Instituted at the first whisper of misconduct, these processes demand rigour, transparency and unwavering adherence to principle.
A well-managed disciplinary process can quell discord, restore trust and demonstrate an organisation’s commitment to fairness. Conversely, a flawed process can spark apathy and litigation, erode morale, tarnish reputations and compromise productivity.
The dual mindset of a chairperson
A disciplinary committee chairperson must wear two hats: risk management and quality assurance. They must be both vigilant and meticulous, ensuring the process withstands scrutiny and aligns with statute and best practice.
This dual mindset is the bedrock of effective leadership, enabling them to navigate the intricate dance of employment law, organisational policies and human emotions.
Risk vigilance
With disciplinary proceedings being quasi-judicial in nature, chairpersons must tread carefully, aware that missteps can create a minefield that invites judicial review.
Appointing authorities, take heed: Applying undue pressure on disciplinary chairpersons is a recipe for disaster.
The chairperson’s risk mindset is the organisation’s shield, protecting it from the ravages of litigation and reputational damage. A single error can undo years of goodwill, making the chairperson’s role both critical and coveted. Sadly, many disciplinary processes are “fixed matches”, where the “invisible hand” of the executive or board dictates outcomes before the process even begins.
The “remote-controlled” chairperson is a risk that organisations must be alive to.
Quality assurance: The
last line of defence
From ensuring procedural propriety to substantive fairness, chairpersons are the guardians of quality.
Any lapse creates risk, making their role both critical and coveted. They must ensure that the process is fair, transparent and free from bias, providing a robust defence against allegations of unfair treatment.
Gravitas: The bedrock of trust
A chairperson’s gravitas sets the tone. They are not advocates for management or employees; they are stewards of fairness.
Their demeanour must inspire confidence, assuring all parties of their impartiality. A chairperson’s presence can soothe ruffled feathers, calm nerves and create an environment conducive to fair play. Most importantly, chairpersons need to appreciate that they have a constitutional duty to ensure fair proceedings. This is not just an employer obligation but a duty to the State.
One must ask: Are disciplinary committee chairpersons aware that they owe this duty to the State?
Setting the tone: The
art of introduction
The introductory stage of a hearing is pivotal. A chairperson’s calm, composed demeanour lays the groundwork for a civil, fair hearing. Antagonism has no place here; empathy and assurance do.
A well-crafted introduction establishes the tone, clarifies expectations and creates a sense of procedural fairness.
The soft skills imperative
Chairpersons are not just legal technicians; they are maestros of process, adept at managing people and emotions. Soft skills are their currency and calm assurance is their hallmark.
They must navigate complex power dynamics, manage conflicting expectations and maintain a delicate balance between firmness and fairness.
Read more on www.heraldonline.co.zw
Risk management: Notice and procedure
Establishing the receipt of disciplinary notices and the adequacy of the notice period is crucial.
Read more on www.heraldonline.co.zw
Chairpersons must clear these procedural hurdles before delving into the merits of the case to ensure the process is fair and transparent. Failure to do so can render the process null and void, making it vulnerable to judicial review.
Preliminary submissions: Clearing the decks
Addressing preliminary issues such as notice, evidence and the suitability of the chairperson sanitises the process and ensures a credible hearing.
Chairpersons must be vigilant, identifying potential pitfalls and taking corrective action to ensure the process remains fair and transparent.
As we pause here, one question lingers: Can organisations afford to leave the fate of their disciplinary processes to chance? The answer lies in the hands of those who chair these proceedings.
In the next instalment, we will explore further best practices for disciplinary committee chairpersons, delving into the intricacies of evidence, witness management and decision-making.
* Dr Request Machimbira is the executive director of Proficiency Consulting Group and the International Wellness Institute. He is a leading, multi-award-winning human resources expert, strategy facilitator, board trainer, team-building coach and wellness consultant. He is also an independent labour arbitrator, board chairperson and published author. He writes in his personal capacity. For feedback, email: [email protected], phone: +263 772 693 404.
