Gaddafi’s love for black Africa

first. The reason I was neutral was due to the fact that the rebels had no outside help and Libya’s business was the business of Libya.
When Gaddafi began defeating the rebels I took it neutrally, meanwhile, the BBC were criticising Gaddafi for attacking with planes and firing at them with guns and had hired mercenaries to murder the rebels.
At the time the rebels were protesters, I thought it was evil of Gaddafi to bomb them, but I felt that as a British person I had no right in supporting a foreign intervention. As the protesters became rebels and armed themselves, Gaddafi apparently was judged by the British media for apparently stating that the rebels were rats and that he will essentially destroy them.
I am wondering why the judgment?
Why cannot the leader of a country threaten to destroy an armed rebellion in his nation? If I were the dictator of a nation my reaction would have been simply “surrender or die” to an armed rebellion.
When foreign intervention occurred, it was done by Nato and led by Britain, France and America.
That is when I knew there was something extremely dodgy about the whole affair. Apparently the reason for helping the rebels were to liberate the Libyan people and to stop human rights abuses.
That is when my support went fully to Gaddafi. If the NATO forces wished to liberate people why not attack Yemen or Bahrain? They have much worse human rights abuses than Libya had. But then I remembered! Libya has oil! Then I found out that Libya had the highest standards of living in the whole of Africa.
It also had the best women’s rights and protected minorities such as black people( Gaddafi had even supported black people marrying Arab Libyans) Other things came to my knowledge also, such as there having been a lot of lying involved by the media.
According to Amnesty International the rebels and the media claimed that Gaddafi had hired mercenaries to murder protesters, had bought viagra-like drugs so his forces could rape women and had been massacring civilians. None were true. The reason that so many black people were on the side of Gaddafi were due to the rebels, the rebels had decided to murder black people. So the reason that so much blacks were fighting for Gadaffi was that he was the only thing stopping them being lynched.
I must say that the end of Gaddafi made me feel quite a lot of respect towards him. He had at the beginning of the war declared that he would battle to the bitter end. Unlike the others who had fallen, Gadaffi had not run away like a coward. I respect the fact that he had managed to get all female members of his family out of Libya. I believe that Gaddafi knew he was doomed and had decided to die in his hometown. I do not believe I could do that. If I were a ‘dictator’ I believe I would run away like a filthy coward. According to Gaddafi’s personal driver “He was always standing still and looking to the west. I didn’t see fear in him.”
If a revolution occurred in Britain, would David Cameron be staring off to the west unafraid and preparing for his death in his hometown as his regime collapsed around him? No! David Cameron unlike Gaddafi is a fearful cowardly excrement!
I feel extremely saddened when I hear of Gaddafi’s sons dying for him. I feel sad when I hear of a man preparing for his death as his nation is ruined. David Cameron I will never feel sadness for he does not understand what making a country better is like. He only has interests in destroying his nation for his own gain. The rebels should be proud of themselves. They have gotten rid of the kindest evil ‘dictator’ in Africa.
They have destroyed the greatest country in Africa and have destroyed its infastructure, they have murdered innocent black people. The rebels shall enjoy themselves in the rubble of a nation they had wrecked.
They will have freedom. Freedom as traitors of their nation and slaves to the oil barons. – DayAfrica.com