admindate. Designed in 2000 by developed countries on behalf of developing countries, the MDGs were collectively promoted as a near-final solution to the development quagmire that drowns a section of the globe.
With most African countries at the bottom of the development ranking, the region’s leaders were all too eager to sign on to the MDGs. Across Africa, government representatives were quick to utter the initially unfamiliar acronym, especially to the hearing of donors. After all, the donors were the ones who set the MDGs; the ones who wanted to spend their money to accomplish the goals; and the ones who sent their monitoring and implementation team to Africa for follow up. And in that mindset lay perhaps, the greatest criticisms of the MDGs; that although the MDGs are what every human being should aspire towards, the manner of achievement of those goals would invariably dehumanise its recipients.
Vaguely defined in terms of operational strategy, the MDGs did not set out to empower citizens to take on the positive challenge of strengthening their communities in the targeted areas. The burden for the achievement of the MDGs lay on wealthy nations; it was a plan drafted upon the benevolence of the rich towards the poor. The MDGs are not human development goals, they are philanthropic goals. So far as poor countries depended on rich countries for sustenance, they stood a chance of reaching the goals. Should the developing countries of the world decide to become entirely independent in thinking, idea generation and implementation, then the need would definitely arise for the crafting of fresh goals.
Essentially, the MDGs were established on presumptions of expertise on the part of developed countries, of the intimate developmental complexities of developing countries; a we-know-what-you-need-and-how-you-need-it-fixed paradigm. The MDGs were founded on a disguised superiority complex that held citizens of developing countries as people unable to understand the intricacies of their own existence, and therefore incapable of formulating workable, homegrown solutions.
Not surprisingly and despite its stellar intentions, the MDGs are today associated with gross underperformance. The reality is that no matter how well intentioned or how much infused with “expert” knowledge, development conversations, which do not focus on empowering citizens to discover and utilise creative, innovative, indigenous and home-grown approaches to solve their own peculiar problems, are at best, peripheral. Regrettably, this has been the paradigm that has defined much of the development pathways charted for Africa by the West. The Lagos Plan of Action remains the last well-known development plan authentically prepared by Africans for Africa.
The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), a plan copied from the west, but touted as authentically African, has since inception struggled to find its place outside of the development dictionary. Rootless, lacking in widespread support from the masses for whom it was conceived, and heavy in jargons, semantics and technical terms alien to most of its African executioners, NEPAD hangs like a paralysed limb, and remains mentally detached for the most part, from the realities of the average African’s dilemma.
For Africa, there is the urgent and desperate need for a radically different approach to understanding and tackling regional challenges post 2015. At a meeting organised by the UNDP to discuss the post 2015 development agenda for Africa, Professor Aliounne Sall of the African Future Institute rightly said that there is need for a paradigm shift in discussing a post MDGs agenda for Africa. He called for Africans to “think differently, to talk differently and to act differently.” t. Africa’s greatest challenge is creativity and innovation founded on indigenous knowledge and indigenous resources.
The urgent need in Africa is for homegrown, creative solutions and breakthroughs in governance, science and technology, economic policies, curriculum, health and wellness, and just about any area of human existence covered and not covered by the MDGs. Hugely absent in Africa are ideas rooted in Africa’s indigenous material and non-material resources, ranging from mineral, environmental, herbal, ecological, agricultural practices, social organisation, political processes, medical knowledge, and numerous others. Africa’s own knowledge systems and ideas are the most valid, inexpensive and easily accessible resources that will bring about advancement for the continent. The formulators of the numerous development plans superimposed on Africa have had little or no regard for the continent’s indigenous knowledge, and because of that Africans themselves hold their knowledge and abilities in contempt.
Unlocking the latent creative and innovate potentials of Africans is heavily dependent on the formal, non-formal and informal education obtainable across the continent. The foundations of Africa’s education was built on the search by missionaries and colonial masters for interpreters, translators, clerks, messengers, typists, secretaries and other auxiliary staff; it was and – 50 years later, unbelievably – remains the sort of education that falls just a little bit short of out rightly discouraging creativity and innovation. – The African Executive.
Online Reporter