The Obama deception

entities and secret societies.
Such entities include the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, Wall Street banks, the Federal Reserve, the military-industrial complex and others, arguing that multinational corporations and powerful elite families, such as the Rothschild and Rockefeller families hold the real “power behind the throne.”
The documentary claims the main motive of these groups is to set up a New World Order where offshore banks subversively engage in the looting of the wealth of the American people. Though the documentary primarily focuses on Barack Obama and his actions during his young presidency. Jones also discusses John F Kennedy, whom he calls the ‘‘last true President of the United States’’, as well as George HW Bush, and the George W Bush administration.
The film claims Obama was carefully installed by powerful elite families, and that he is deliberately working against the best interests of the American people. I am inclined to agree given how this so-called son of Africa has outdone his white predecessors in raping his mother land. No doubt the most notable feature of Obama’s re-election campaign is its sheer cynicism. Having devoted his entire tenure to protecting and expanding the wealth of the financial elite at the expense of the working population, Obama is now presenting himself as the partisan of the common man and opponent of greed and privilege.
Take his stance on the Middle East for instance where he behaves like a bull in a China shop.
The announcement that the US, Russia, China, the UK, France and Germany plan to reopen negotiations with Iran to solve the controversy around Iran’s nuclear program could not come at a better time for Obama. It gives him a little wriggle room to circumvent the disingenuousness of the Republicans in this matter.
In all of this manoeuvring, the Jewish vote is the prized jewel and the Republicans are too willing to say and do anything to capture it. Talk of war and the “existential threat” against Israel are the easiest ways to play on Jewish legitimate fears and insecurities and the best way to alienate them from Obama.
With a population of about five times that of Trinidad and Tobago, Jewish voters play a key role in electing any American president. In a close election they can make a substantial difference as to who wins or loses. Given the distribution of their population, their financial prowess, and their voting tenacity, no presidential candidate can be oblivious to the strength of this voting bloc. Although Mitt Romney, the front runner in the Republican primary, is scandalously out of touch with global realities, in a close election, he can capture the highest office in the US. Such an outcome is not beyond the realm of possibility. Few persons expected George W Bush to serve two terms as the US president.
He got the country into wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. When he arrived in office the US coffers were filled to overflowing. When he left office the country was in recession and indebted to China. Today, the unemployment rate stands at 8,6 percent and gasoline prices keep on rising. The prospect for any long term growth in the economy is shaky at best.
Yet there are those who are willing to force Obama into war with Iran to embarrass him, take the country back into recession, and rid the US of its first Black president. Rather than speak about Israel’s response to the Palestinian issue, they are using as much soft power as possible to get Obama to plunge the United States into war again even as they assure Americans that such precipitate action would have no effect on the global economy. They tell us the US has an unquestioned responsible to support Israel no matter what it does. Any serious scholar of the region knows that once Israel attacks Iran the cost of oil would rise precipitously, US relations with the Islamic world will suffer a major setback, and the US pretended neutrality will be shattered.
But Israeli leaders, Republican presidential candidates, the right wing conservatives, and the evangelicals (about 100 million of them) are ready to depict Obama’s reluctance to use military force as political weakness in spite of his other foreign policy successes (including the assassination of Ben Laden).
In “How to Beat Obama,” an article in Foreign Affairs (March-April 2012), Karl Rove, a major Republican strategist, argued that Obama has lost “much of the political and financial support in the Jewish community” because he has mishandled the Iranian threat to Israel. It matters not that US intelligence has affirmed there is no evidence that Iran has gone from nuclear enrichment to bomb-making. It does not even matter that Israel already has the nuclear bomb. All that matters is the deployment of a manufactured controversy to get Obama out of the White House.
Last week, Benjamin Netanyahu visited the United States. A week before he arrived, John McCain, a formidable cold warrior, led a small congressional delegation to Israel to meet with Netanyahu. Citing the complementarities of interest between the two countries, he declared: “There should be no daylight between America and Israel in our assessment of the threat (from Iran.)” One wonders if it is ever to the US advantage to identify its national interest so fully with any other country, including Israel.