US calls for new IMF, World Bank steps on liquidity pressures

THE US Treasury’s top economic diplomat on Friday called on the International Monetary Fund and multilateral development banks to work on new ways to provide short-term liquidity support to low- and middle-income countries to head off debt crises.

Jay Shambaugh, the Treasury’s undersecretary for international finance, told an Atlantic Council event that the Treasury was working with these institutions “to find a better path” for countries with high but sustainable debts that face liquidity pressures. Shambaugh, who oversees the dominant US shareholdings in the IMF and World Bank, said he hoped that the institutions could make progress at their annual meetings later this month in developing new mechanisms and programme design changes that meet the needs of a vast number of countries dealing with temporary shocks.

“If you are a country committed to sustainable development and if you are willing to engage with the IMF and MDBs to unlock significant financing alongside significant reform measures, there needs to be a financing package from bilateral, multilateral, and private sector sources to bridge your liquidity needs in a way that is supportive of your sustainable long-run development,” Shambaugh said.

The plan “will require hard work and innovation” at the international financial institutions, he said, adding that they will need to design their lending and reform programmes in a way that avoids having temporary fiscal adjustments lead to permanent harm due to cuts to important investments, such as for infrastructure.

Shambaugh also continued his criticism of China’s economic policies, including recent steps by Beijing to direct more subsidies to manufacturing investments despite producing a third of the world’s manufactured goods.

He said the strategy would cause export spillovers to other countries and is “unlikely to be successful” in the absence of domestic demand.

“By focusing on manufacturing via nonmarket tools and subsidies despite China’s already outsized role, this also means China may be closing what has been a typical development path to many other countries eyeing low-cost manufacturing as the next stage of their development,” Shambaugh said.

“And by channelling the saving to particular sectors, this increases the likelihood of overcapacity and spillovers to other countries.” —  Reuters

Related Posts

Zimbabwean Business Council-United Arab Emirates advances multimillion-dollar UAE deals

Judith Phiri [email protected] THE Zimbabwean Business Council-United Arab Emirates (ZIBCO-UAE) has said several commercial discussions valued between US$10 million and US$200 million have reached advanced stages. This comes as the…

EXPLAINER: Why Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and DRC are part of COMESA

SEVERAL COMESA member states lie outside the traditional geographic definitions of Eastern and Southern Africa. Non-Eastern/Southern African COMESA members North Africa: Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. Central Africa: Democratic Republic of…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×