Merkel explains decision on carbon emissions

A coalition of EU states led by Germany prevented approval of the measure at a meeting of diplomats in Brussels last week. Merkel said that she moved to delay the proposal – which would cap average carbon discharges by passenger vehicles in the bloc at 95 grammes a kilometre in 2020 – “This is also about employment,” Merkel told reporters in Brussels last week after a European Union summit.

“That’s why we need time to review and evaluate and decide what we will do. That’s why the vote didn’t happen.”
Merkel’s intervention, made less than three months before federal elections, collided with EU efforts to cap pollution by cars through varying targets for individual manufacturers ranging from Volkswagen AG to General Motors Co.

Current EU legislation requires carmakers to cut discharges to 130 grammes a kilometre on average in 2015 and sets a non-binding goal of 95 grammes for 2020.
Ireland, representing the EU governments, and negotiators from the European Parliament reached a preliminary deal on the draft emissions law on June 24.

The proposal needs qualified-majority support from national governments. That failed to materialise at a two-day meeting of EU leaders billed as a jobs summit that ended last week.

While the European Commission, the EU’s regulatory arm, said earlier that it was disappointed about the delay, Merkel rebuffed any such criticism on economic grounds.
“At a time when we’re spending days sitting here talking about employment, we have to take care that, notwithstanding the need to make progress on environmental protection, we don’t weaken our own industrial base,” Merkel said.

It now falls to Lithuania, which takes over the bloc’s rotating presidency from Ireland this week, to propose a new date for a decision on the matter.
Ford Motor Co said it was disappointed that a minority of member states was able “to delay a well-balanced agreement,” spokesman Adrian Schmitz said by e-mail last week.

The deal made between Ireland and the Parliament includes the continued use of so-called supercredits, or incentives, to encourage car producers to develop clean technologies.
The supercredits need to be applied in a “more meaningful way,” according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association.
Greenpeace said in an e-mail that any further weakening of the proposal would be “pure greed” and the cost would be borne by European drivers. – Bloomberg.

Related Posts

Treasury clarifies OPC Budget utilisation

Herald Reporter The Ministry of Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion has dismissed claims of a spending spree by the Office of the President and Cabinet (OPC), clarifying that the…

Chihora upbeat ahead of World U20 Champs

Ellina Mhlanga Zimpapers Sports Hub TEAM Zimbabwe’s captain Nenyasha Chihora says they are ready to leave a mark at the World Athletics Under-20 Championships scheduled for August 5 to 9…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×