Mutambara’s ouster above board — High Court

He ruled that the national organis­ing secretary was justified in chairing the election considering that the party chairman had deliberately absented himself.
Abandoning the congress because of the chairman’s deliberate absence would amount to promoting monop­oly in party leadership.

“It follows that the resolution autho­rising the national organising secre­tary to perform the functions of the national chairperson at the congress, including the conduct of elections under Article 6.13.3 was per­fectly competent under the aegis of Article 15.1.
“In the instant case, having deliber­ately absented himself from the con­gress the first applicant (Mudzumwe) cannot rely on his absence to argue that all the proceedings at the congress were a nullity because he was not pres­ent.

Related stories

• Court ruling doesn’t spell political doom for Mutambara: Experts

• Welshman Ncube group engages in fictional politics

• Mutambara contests ruling on MDC presidency

• Mutambara loses MDC presidency

• New executive for MDC-M

• MPs walk out on Prof Ncube

• MDC formations fight over MPs

• Mutambara, Ncube case: Judgment reserved

• Mutambara, Ncube face off

• Mutambara faction ejected from indaba

“To allow him to do so would enable him to benefit from his own deliberate abstention to the extreme prejudice              of the entire MDC party member-         ship.
“It would allow party leaders to cir­cumvent and frustrate the electoral process and remain in office indefi­nitely through the simple stratagem of non-attendance,” he ruled.

Justice Patel shot down the challenge on proper notification of provinces and districts.
He ruled that the party members complied with the constitutional requirement.
“Over 4 000 delegates representing all the provinces and districts actually attended the congress.

“Those who did not attend, including the applicants, deliberately chose to boycott. In any event, virtually all the applicants were members of the national council and were present at the meeting where the dates of the congress were fixed.
“It follows in my view that the provision was not violated in any way and was duly complied with,” Justice Patel ruled.

The election process, the judge ruled, was above board and in line with the party constitution.
“In short, what transpired at the congress in casu was an electoral process. I am therefore inclined to con­clude that the proceedings under consideration, notwithstanding the absence of any opposition to the can­didates nominated, constituted elections in the formal sense, requiring the active involvement of a desig­nated official to preside over the conduct of those elections,” the court ruled.

Mr Changamire said the group intended to appeal against the judgment.
“We are not happy with the judgment. The judgment left out a lot of issues. We are taking it up to the Supreme Court. We will soon file an appeal,” he said.

In December last year, Bulawayo High Court judge Justice Lawrence Kamocha granted an application by Prof Ncube to interdict Prof Mutambara from acting as both party president and principal to the Global Political Agreement.

Justice Kamocha ruled that basing on the final order sought, Prof Mutambara was no longer MDC pres­ident.
He said the party was justified in launching the application restraining Pro Mutambara from persisting with his behaviour.
The judge added that the outcome of the party congress remains valid until and unless it was set aside by a court of law.

However, the matter is still pending in the Supreme Court after Prof Mutambara appealed against the ruling.