Online Reporter
Fidelis Munyoro
Chief Court Reporter
THE National Prosecuting Authority has paused its bid to seize properties owned by convicted businessmen Mike Chimombe and Moses Mpofu.
Both were found guilty of defrauding the Government of US$7 million through the Presidential Goat Pass-on Scheme.
Their next court date is Friday, where a pre-sentencing inquiry will take place ahead of the final ruling on November 17.
In a notice issued yesterday, the NPA announced the withdrawal of the notice given on the 31st of October 2025 to make an application for forfeiture as provided for in section 50(1) as read with section 39(4) of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act [Chapter 9:24],” read the notice signed by prosecutor Mr Whisper Mabhaudi.
The notice further stated: “On the 14th of November 2025, the State will be proceeding with the pre-sentencing procedures as provided for in Sl 146 of 2023, wherein the State has already filed its address in aggravation.”
The prosecution had been advocating for severe prison terms and the confiscation of properties tied to the fraudulent scheme.
They argued that the forfeiture was justified based on the convictions.
However, following internal consultations, the NPA resolved to withdraw the application temporarily, with the intention to refile it later.
The Asset Forfeiture Unit is expected to take over the process, citing the need for detailed investigations requiring time and resources.
Initially, the prosecution sought to invoke Section 50(1) of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act to recover assets linked to the crime.
The defence, however, opposed the move, insisting that any confiscation proceedings should be handled separately.
The law empowers authorities to track, seize, and confiscate assets acquired through illegal means, and the prosecution remains committed to using these tools to recover the stolen funds.
Chimombe and Mpofu’s fraud case has gripped the legal system, with the duo remaining in remand prison for over 15 months.
The High Court’s recent decision to convict them brought to a close a protracted legal battle.
Justice Pisirayi Kwenda, in his ruling, emphasised the seriousness of the offence, stating the evidence against the accused was overwhelming.
